by Jason RosenEdge Highshare Updates and Recent Correspondence
This blog will provide those who purchased a Franchise in any year with an update in respect of our ongoing Edge related dispute with the CRA. If you require an overview of the Edge program dispute in general please review our previous Edge Highshare Blog.
Below, please find a summary for the stage of the dispute resolution process that each franchise year is currently in, along with what will be happening in the near future.
2012 Franchisees
Some Franchisees, who invested in this year, are already in Tax Court. However, others are a few months into the appeals process but have elected to hold their position in order to join the 2013 Franchisees, which consists of a much larger group and allows us to split fees amongst more people.
If you are in the appeals process and looking to join our group for tax court, please contact Rosen Kirshen Tax Law.
2013 Franchisees
If you are a 2013 Franchisee, the CRA’s review of your previously submitted objection representations will take a significant amount of time.
It is our understanding that the completion of this dispute could take years to complete at the CRA appeals division (similar to the 4-5 years consumed by Audit). As well, the CRA has advised that they have not yet designated a team of appeal officers to focus on the Edge/Highshare matter.
As such it is our recommendation that franchisees in this predicament proceed straight to Tax Court.
2014 Franchisees
The CRA’s audit of the 2014 Franchisees has been completed for all of our clients. They have received final letters which outline the adjustments that the audit division made to their previous returns. After the CRA issues a final audit letter, a notice of reassessment for each taxation year will be issued creating the alleged tax liability, some of our clients have already received these reassessments.
Once these reassessments are issued, we can proceed to either:
(a) file a Notice of Objection and remain in the queue at CRA; or
(b) file a Notice Objection to start the 91-day clock allowing us to by-pass the anticipated delay inherent with the CRA appeals process and proceed to defend our position in the Tax Court.
As with the 2013 Franchisees, it is our recommendation that franchisees at this junction bypass CRA appeals and proceed to Tax Court. Furthermore, the CRA has not provided personalized audit responses but rather grouped their position into one final letter applicable to all of our clients. This blatant disregard for the taxpayer’s rights solidifies our recommendation of disputing these matters in Tax Court.
2015 Franchisees
The audit of 2015 Franchisees has begun. Many of our clients have received proposal letters already. This outlines the adjustments that the CRA is intending to make along with a brief explanation of their ill-founded reasons.
The deadline to respond to the proposal letters is usually 30 days from when they are issued. However, we have a working relationship with the designated team and they have afforded us the opportunity to negotiate extensions. If you have received an audit proposal letter from the CRA for your 2015 Franchise do not hesitate contact Rosen Kirshen Tax Law for assistance.
Moving forward, we anticipate the CRA will not issue a final audit position for several months. This is because, following the final audit letter being issued, it will likely take them several weeks to process the results and issue a Notice of Reassessment.
If you have bought into the Edge/Highshare franchise agreements, and are being audited by the CRA, contact our office today. Call us today for more information about this potential action and about how we can help.
**Disclaimer
This article provides information of a general nature only. It does not provide legal advice nor can it or should it be relied upon. All tax situations are specific to their facts and will differ from the situations in the articles. If you have specific legal questions you should consult a lawyer.
by Jeff KirshenReal Estate Agents and Incorporating a Company
For years, professions have been lobbying the province of Ontario to be permitted to incorporate. After doctors were given the right to incorporate over a decade ago, legislation has been introduced and tabled that would grant the same rights to real estate agents. To date, nothing has passed. However, it appears that Bill 104, the Tax Fairness for Realtors Act, is picking up steam, and soon may finally grant real estate agents the right to incorporate their business.
Tax Benefits for Real Estate Agents who Incorporate
Passing Bill 104 would carry significant tax benefits for real estate agents who decide to incorporate. In the province of Ontario, the highest income tax bracket is 53.53%, for every dollar earned over $220,000. As real estate agents are sole proprietors, their businesses have been subject to the same marginal tax rates as Ontario incomes.
However, as a Personal Real Estate Corporation, real estate agents will be able to enjoy the Ontario small business tax rate, which is 13.5% on the first $500,000 of income earned. Furthermore, as long as the corporation is owned, controlled, and operated in Canada, it can enjoy the Canadian Controlled Private Corporations tax rate of 26.5% on income that exceeds $500,000. The incorporation route promises huge tax savings for real estate agents.
There are also valuable income splitting opportunities with corporations’ income, which would be accessible to real estate agents. Income splitting allows corporations to separate its income among family members, which can be done strategically to stay in lower tax brackets. Corporations can do this by either paying them a “fair salary”, or issuing dividends.
There are also large tax deferral opportunities. Individuals are required to report income to the CRA that they earned during the year. Corporations only have to pay tax on income that is withdrawn. Therefore, they can delay the payment on a share of income by just leaving it in the corporation. This gives corporations significant tax planning advantages, as they can control the amount of income leaving their corporation in a specific tax year to lower their tax obligations.
Reporting Requirements for Real Estate Corporations
Of course, with incorporation comes new challenges. Requirements for filing and record keeping for corporations are far more onerous than for individuals. There are also indirect taxes like employer health tax, WSIB, taxes for payroll and GST/HST on commissions that can add expenses. In essence, while the power to incorporate would give real estate agents far more power to file their income strategically and enjoy small business tax rates, it also requires a far more complicated tax filing process with more costly obligations.
If you are a real estate agent and would like to discuss the implications of incorporating your business in the near future, contact our firm for a free consultation. We are here to help!
**Disclaimer
This article provides information of a general nature only. It does not provide legal advice nor can it or should it be relied upon. All tax situations are specific to their facts and will differ from the situations in this article. If you have specific legal questions you should consult a lawyer.
by Jeff KirshenHome Depot and the CRA
In July of 2019, the Canada Revenue Agency used the “unnamed person requirement” to obtain a Federal Court order compelling Home Depot to disclose customer information to the CRA.
The CRA started its application for the information in 2016, but the application was put on hold while Rona disputed a similar application. Rona fought the CRA all the way to the Federal Court of Appeal, where it lost. It attempted to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of Canada, but leave to appeal was denied.
At that point, Home Depot informed the CRA that they would not challenge the application.
In September of 2019, Home Depot sent out letters to the customers affected, notifying them that their information would be provided to the CRA.
Who is Involved in this Request?
This involves customers who used Home Depot’s commercial credit card program between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016.
What Information and Documentation is being sent to the CRA?
Home Depot was compelled to disclose the identity, address, and the total annual amount spent by each customer.
What is the “Unnamed Person Requirement”?
The “unnamed person requirement” (UPR) found in the Income Tax Act is often utilized by the CRA to obtain information related to taxpayers from third parties.
As long as there is reasonable evidence that tax evasion is occurring, the CRA will likely succeed in obtaining the information requested.
UPR is often used by the audit division within the CRA in order to obtain information on taxpayers. The CRA has multiple options on how to obtain information during audit.
Why is the CRA doing this?
This is an example of the CRA’s latest attack on the underground economy. The CRA is targeting cash industries to discover businesses engaged in tax evasion. A Statistics Canada report released in 2018 found the underground economy accounted for $51.6 billion in 2016, or 2.5% of gross domestic product. Residential construction accounted for 26.6% of that.
The CRA has previously obtained a list of municipal building permits in order to discover unregistered building subcontractors. Their review of 8,396 building permits yielded 2,751 unregistered building contracts.
What Happens Now?
The CRA will use this information to attempt to find Home Depot commercial customers who have avoided filing accurate returns due to the fact that they work in a cash industry.
The CRA will look at the amounts that businesses spent at Home Depot and assess whether the revenue reported to the CRA on tax returns was reasonable in comparison. For example, if a business purchased $100,000 worth of items from Home Depot, but only declared $20,000 in revenue, this would likely be flagged to further review by the CRA audit division.
This will likely result in many businesses involved in construction being audited.
What if I am Affected?
If you are audited by the CRA, you should follow our guide on how to survive an audit.
Businesses or individuals who believe themselves to be at risk from the disclosure of third-party information to the CRA should consider applying to the CRA’s voluntary disclosure program in order to avoid prosecution and gross negligence penalties.
If you are worried about being audited or are considering applying for the voluntary disclosure program, contact our firm for a free consultation. We are here to help!
**Disclaimer
This article provides information of a general nature only. It does not provide legal advice nor can it or should it be relied upon. All tax situations are specific to their facts and will differ from the situations in this article. If you have specific legal questions you should consult a lawyer.