Judicial Review of CERB Decisions
The Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) started issuing letters to individual taxpayers who received the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”) back in 2020, asking them for additional information to support their entitlement to the pandemic benefit.
The CRA letters are specifically addressed to individuals whom the CRA believes earned more than the allowable limit of $1,000 during the periods in which they claimed CERB, or where they believe the individual did not earn the required $5,000 to be eligible for CERB. The CRA is asking these individuals to send in proof of their earnings during, or before the CERB periods. Requested documents includes copies of bank statements showing their income, pay stubs for the relevant periods, invoices issued, and a letter from their employer confirming their income and when it was earned.
The CRA has a two tiered system of review. The first level of review permits individuals to supply the representations and other supporting documents to justify their CERB eligibility. If, following the CRA’s decision, an individual feels that the assessment is incorrect, they may object to the decision and request a second review in writing.
However, if after the second review the individual still feels that the CRA has improperly exercised its discretion, they may apply to the court for judicial review of the CRA’s discretion.
What is Judicial Review?
Judicial Review is a process by which the Federal Court can review the discretionary decisions of administrative bodies, such as the CRA. There are many sections in the Tax Act that provides the CRA with the discretion on whether to act and how to act in certain situations. The purpose of Judicial Review is to allow a judge to review the decisions of administrative bodies for compliance with the law.
Judicial Review at the Federal Court is different from an appeal to the Tax Court of Canada. The Tax Court of Canada is limited in the way it can deal with an appeal. The Tax Court may either confirm the assessment or reassessment, the judge can vacate the assessment and order the CRA to reconsider its decision, and the judge may also direct the CRA to reassess the individual according to his instructions. However, the specific remedy available must be expressly set out in the Tax Act. As such, the Tax Court does not have the power to tell the CRA how to exercise its discretion where the Tax Act allows.
In contrast, the Federal Court is empowered with a broad discretion in the remedies it can grant. The Federal Court can order the CRA to act or not to act in specific ways. Furthermore, the scope of Judicial Review is also much broader in the sense of the type of issues it can bring before the Federal Court. Judicial Review can be used to scrutinize CRA actions such as aggressive behaviours of the CRA without lawful business, the CRA’s refusal to consider proper evidence, the CRA’s refusal to lawfully open an objection to an assessment, and, of course, the CRA’s decision itself.
Essentially, the Federal Court is able to tell the CRA how to exercise its discretion if they believe that the CRA has made an unreasonable ruling. However, it is important to note that the Judicial Review process is not an opportunity for individuals to reargue their case again, but rather an opportunity to address the way by which the CRA reached its decision.
Keep in mind that the Judicial Review process is not looking to confirm what is correct or not, but rather to see if the government’s decision was reasonable.
Do you need Judicial Review for your CERB Denial?
Has the CRA denied you for CERB?
If you feel the CRA has wrongfully denied your CERB entitlement, for reasons such as failing to consider proper evidence amongst others, then you can pursue a Judicial Review application to hold the CRA accountable in Federal Court.
The Federal Court will generally respect discretionary decisions made by the CRA and its delegates as long as decisions are reasonably transparent and not the result of bad faith or fraud. It is extremely imperative that individuals put forth a strong case depending on the type of review.
For discretionary decisions, the Federal Court will most often review the decision according to a standard of reasonableness. An administrative decision will not be interfered with so long as the decision falls within a range of reasonable outcomes, even if the reviewing judge ultimately disagrees with the CRA’s decision. Thus, it is imperative that individuals are able to show the range of reasonable decisions clearly and concisely and demonstrate that the CRA’s decision fell outside the realm of possibilities.
Here at Rosen Kirshen Tax Law, we have the expertise and the knowledge to commence Judicial Review applications of any and all CRA decisions. If you think the CRA made an unreasonable decision on your file, give us a call today to see how we can help!
This article provides information of a general nature only. It does not provide legal advice nor can it or should it be relied upon. All tax situations are specific to their facts and will differ from the situations in this article. If you have specific legal questions, you should consult a lawyer.
Gambling and Taxable Implications in Canada
This article will examine gambling and taxable implications in Canada. Tax Court Says Holding’em Liable for Taxes In two recent 2023 decisions, the...
Gambling and Taxable Implications in Canada
Personal Income Tax Benefit & Credits for Ontarians
While the tax filing deadline is still months away, Canadians (especially Ontarians) should start sorting through receipts as some personal tax credits and...
I have been denied my CRB benefits after providing the CRA with the information they sought. I’m a pre-senior on a disability with a fixed income and require the monies owed to me. You can reach me at 250-880-5317.
Thank you in advance.
Want to file a judicial review for CRA’s decision that I was not eligible to receive my CRA benefits.
Just file a judicial review, need some help with documentation.
Need to file a judicial review after two decisions( re the Cerb I received ) were done by CRA, without letting me contest the first in writing. All done by them in a period of 12 days after talking with me on the phone..even though I had faxed them bank statements & receipts for the period required & told them they were missing info. such as my amended tax report of 2019.
I need help with a judicial review. CRA did not receive all documents. I am not sure how this happened since I called to confirm they had everything. Please email at your earliest convenience.
Index help with judicial review.
I reside in Fredericton, NB. I received a notice from CRA to pay back CERB/CRCB benefits that I received during the COVID-19 (Total amount $16000) and wish to apply for a judicial review. The CRA plead that I did not make $5,000 in 2020, 2021, or in the 12 months before the date I applied for the Canada Worker Lockdown Benefit. What is you advice and how much it will cost me to go that route. Kindly advise. Thanks
Hi, I have received CRB snd CRSB benefits in the year of 2021. Second review is done and CRA decision says that I was not eligible to get the benefits as I didn’t earn $5000 in 2019, 2020 and 2021. I have to repay the $9000 back to CRA. I need advice here.
Hello Team ,
Wishing everythings very well . I need a professional fight for CERB repayment .l can prove net income over $ 5000 in twelve months . From 2019 Sept- Dec net income $ 4200 . From 2020 Jan- March net income $ 3000 total 7200 Please let me know how much chance make CRA go away . I believed this benefit is eligible. Thanks for patience and precious time
CRA has denied my CERB/CRB upon second review . I would like to apply to the Federal Court for a judicial review . This matter is time sensitive, I have 30 days from February 2,2023. Please let me know if you are able to help . Thank you Lily (416) 605-1307